A report just out in Nature titled Evidence of near-ambient superconductivity in a N-doped lutetium hydride, Nathan Dasenbrock-Gammon, Elliot Snider, Raymond McBride, Hiranya Pasan, Dylan Durkee, Nugzari Khalvashi-Sutter, Sasanka Munasinghe, Sachith E. Dissanayake, Keith V. Lawler, Ashkan Salamat & Ranga P. Dias Nature volume 615, pages244–250 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05742-0, makes the following statement in the abstract-
“Here we report evidence of superconductivity on a nitrogen-doped lutetium hydride with a maximum Tc of 294 K at 10 kbar, that is, superconductivity at room temperature and near-ambient pressures.” Emphasis mine.
According to Wikipedia, while lutetium isn’t particularly abundant, it is more abundant than silver in the earth’s crust. The word hydride is a little confusing here. In some contexts is refers to a metal with absorbed hydrogen as a solid solution. To chemists like me it suggests H– anions bound to a metal cation. From what I can tell, reality sits somewhere between these two bookends.
The abstract says that 10 kbar is near-ambient pressure. This number converts to 9869 atmospheres though it is below megabar pressures. I guess I’m not calibrated properly for this.
The abstract is available but the article sits behind a paywall. Interesting research but not presently worth $39.95 to me today.

As NOAA says on its website concerning pressure in the ocean: “The pressure increases about one atmosphere for every 10 meters of water depth. At a depth of 5,000 meters the pressure will be approximately 500 atmospheres or 500 times greater than the pressure at sea level. That’s a lot of pressure.”
https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/eoi/nemo1998/education/pressure.html
Wonder what the temperature is down there.
I think I’m calibrated about right.
You got it, my friend.