Category Archives: Current Events

Schneier on Security

1 Reply

Schneier on Security is one of my favorite non-chemistry blogs. The particular link here is to a post on the NSA and It’s apparent commandeering  of the internet for its own, opaque purposes. Bruce Schneier developed the Blowfish encryption algorithm.

While I have previously criticized Libertarianism and its peculiar conflation of civilization with Austrian economic thinking, I am enough of a civil libertarian to be deeply alarmed by post-911 security paranoia with its narrow readings on the 4th amendment and attending case-law.

Ask yourself, how much of your life do you want to be subject to structural snitch features that trigger silent alarms when your face is recognized in a building, when you called the front desk of a business or agency, or when you download particular information from the internet or just do keyword searches on Google?

You can bet that hordes of NSA folk as well as contractors are working feverishly on what else they can do with this metadata and location data accumulating in datacenters.

Many friends have said half joking that they feel sorry for spooks who have to sift through their chatter and insignificant browser searches. But what if an NSA spook were standing over their shoulder while they did it? How would they feel then? Maybe fellow citizens who approve of this kind of activity should be flagged for participation and the rest of us left alone. Would they feel the same about it?

#####  Encrypted: decrypt with http://www.alltextencryption.com/
ZZZZZ AMLWM LXUBJ RWEEP LRCUC OJIQN IXJHN MUDSO TLUCF SUALW SXGUJ
EQXHJ MPAJT RMBDB NFMVR DJRUU OVPWB HBKNB HAIDK TBGHS MGMPH UWBWQ
XMMHV NSFQM TXPIA SBTMG BLRMN WRBJQ CEQPA RFGEA BEPUM KNVGF CJVEL
VFNOI DIGGQ URKFN QEABQ NLDIM HEPBK KFKPS PSJGG QEIVG RXIBG QRTBN
CIEQM BRCVI TPANX GEIQF HMKGP VUMMM PQCJK DJBQL IHUFI LKRLQ JFCCH
GUUCI BCGVG FTHAW NWSSI PCTXD ANGTH QLWDT LDIDE RBPIB VITCE ALJEL
UVCUP ATVTO OOQPM MDOXO QVDQE DTWOG QJPJF PBKJG IQMXU REHIR ERTUP
XXMBQ JDQJQ IVALB GDOJB IUBKD PLWKL MEMHQ RJDXT IOTJV AOXVO LUWKH
IDIDK GLFWR GJTTH TPLFH FWUXB OBQDJ KUPGU RBXDI WTLSA LGHXW WCHXJ
WHLPX KFQGW KLAKE QBSXE EOAXK UWFPM MXVTA NMRRB PCGEI CTKXA FGPPH
FNEEJ OBVKE FJGCD VJMON KFHRJ VAGAE PMNTO ABKCQ XVEIE UXPFE NGRKH
NDOPP XWSQD TOXDX RLPTJ WQUMB WFKIM NCNXR GHWEM CRVSH MPTWH VRCNT
EHBTG RDIMV ASRBB DICNJ GOJIN TJQBW HNWFM XGJIK HBSQP FQKGM VBKXM
IAQSL DEJQE DKFRJ TPLGE PGTEJ EMUAX WNLPQ RCRXR UPTUQ UHOUE TJIQK
EMQLH PQIMW ORDLR JXNFO MLXNU OOIVX DRISP WMLNE LWDBB PIRDX UOLQP
MUXON QGQRG WWSVW OESNV SJNUX XSKIT JIDCW XPVLX KHMIF JSJCD UDQHX
MPEIQ VMWTU EVNAG IAMPR ULOAW PTSMN ICDIM FRNJJ BPOTV MEMBB TOKJR
IERQV CONBI IEMAE JBPKS KNSAI FCORP UPWSG PQSGF IGIPH LFKWE LHTHI
TJEVI FLDDF TNPHC JKCWP JCUWJ QLDIO BFXCB FCFNL VVTVA XPXET BXRDV
KGNAU MTACT RGEKE ONNLU ENGOM LNUPL ECWAN JRWGB HFJPR BNSXK BLAGC
PMIUD MRDBB CRAFC QWHMT GITXL MTITS GNMUT OPOAW WILAK ORFRP EVIEJ
XTFRW LSGTX HFCXN QLWBJ TPQOB MKPND QOOJS HCVTO NDGMJ VSNFG VNOGM
PULQC TCRUR HQTTI BCDEH CSSMX CWLGR FGGCJ LVVWO JKBSW QTSTW DQFJB
WQCXX KFHVN FJKPN KGDKP ITVGF OSWTU PQMKN GEBPB QWSMU JHGRA KWSIU
BVRQM TJUJM EWUOS NFLPQ DSWXM QEWIU QEGSD TLEDF VLBGM AXLLS TNWFF
IHKJH SIIIT VFKUF PTGTS XATWE JAQRC MTIKL GJGXI DSOTG EJHMV BFSSB
FWKEW OPCXU GTEFI ABGTE IHTFU POIDT TJEHT SNJUX NPUFA RPKVF FQQHO
WWUJB NDUXP JTXJP GOEVL ECHTG IULAQ LVFUC BXKBB FJBLV XLHOB SGOBJ
XTMUU TKGOR QIJVJ BJRXF GIOBN LIKWA HUQFB VUOBI MMUHV SSOOX ELRGO
ENSPI XCQDA JAGOS WCIWB MJFTM RQBSG UGQKM PIOFI DTFPT RAMAM XCEBL
XDJHQ UKDIS PAAMK HEAIJ RWLIR KINJM OVWFU CSOHQ MIPBT HGCUI UABIB
AHCIO SJHJI ITUSM IGSIX PVONM PREBB LFFPB DIWPE VGWWM CLBSM TDENR
RLMAJ OTBCM PIPKL QJMOC WSXBK UXRJM MERJC VLLDJ AGOXP CHVMF UUVKE
EQXEN JEIOK VJWRV DJWKM ANBKD NTMAF XKJXC VFNJK MTPUL BBKOC AAPUP
HOKHM UIUMX QBJKP NDEMB OKVQA QJEBC GUMBB NPBTA DHTFC RVXUH NGGSI
JRXVW XLGXL OVMHO EHWHT FHWFC QUNLM GWCAJ TVJLE TQQMR TILJB PIVKU
GQWSP MWTLR ETFDB LEKLA AFIIB XQFIR NIGDQ OPVDQ GERAO CSWKC BXJFK
TWUFE SRALS LSJKH VOWPB TKIDF LSKEM AEKVB UOHVM NQPHO ALDEL TIKNG
XLMHO OLBID HHNIB RHFSW LQXJI PNTNU XQUDH EOXUI SSHBE FIGGK SCGAF
ILGVH RNUVR SADCI BFBDQ PKBPO MHPLF SGRNK HNTAN FMIPF KCAUN GPKEE
DKTVA JGQHH VNNVK KXRGK PFTGA LBKFC EJXAR IMMIL KAABK VTNFI EPXGP
OKHWX PHDSH HLGWK VABCS GFBLG PWJAI XGGMF GWHKK AMWEG WLEGM URDTP
PFOKP ORAAV QKONR ULKDT NVXGF VTPOM MCXNI SICPO CJQGE AKUNX UCBJB
QPEWX UQKLS STGKI DLAOA GFJVT SSRLJ SJKNN LMEUO BFECR KPGGG NGRSI
STFMT QIMNE IVLBV HSVTN BJJRJ FTMTN LNTNO GUVHJ JGBEV LNIQU IOMMB
HVFSH XVCGH QTHLQ MCRQB EPJQK FCICV UCPQW FWGEE KGQIB PUCUN AAIAK
NPTIO MFUGX DGWNJ XDHSU WXMUX RHMQT UPEVN LXDWP AEOHT NLMLR WMTFR
LPTHW LFEWL WJEJI EGQQO PJWTD WOGIT LCPSR PDCII CWXVA ODECW RCHXH
IKRSV NLLKD JAIKF NWMBR PDLHU ONDKT SWISL SCGMR NACEX NOQTM SJXTR
VJXWD OOCWU UBFOE SIBLH SQGFC OVUCQ XWDPK IFNQT OFPTV OSUUO FVNID
VPIMI FMOIE FSQTE TSUSH LNAML ROGKJ FSOQD XCTLB KUKKJ IPSHT VRKVH
JHNMM CXUEC DUIJR WLMKQ CBSXS DJXVW HFMLR RNPAK QFHXI SJAKV LLNTH
ASSOJ RUGEP PJGSI VNDPP LFHNR WSIRX AEWIU RDJWX CDGCF TOEFK LKNGD
WKXDJ PFREN OHTVH PTBKI HTRPJ AQTEC HAFUP FAAPQ JBTVM QNQSJ HDVGQ
OPDNE SJIAX VZZZZ YYYYY
#####  End encrypted message

Heap Big Stinkum

1 Reply

The current movie “The Lone Ranger” is a real stinker. The buffoons who produce pictures like this should not be encouraged with good attendance figures. You can’t build a movie solely on a sight gag consisting of Johnny Depp with a dead crow on his head. In fact, I’d rather not invest anymore heartbeats on the topic. <end>

Comments on Edward Snowdon

Leave a reply

I have to say that I am tickled to death over what young Edward Snowdon has done in regard to his leaking of the NSA PRISM project. Funding and compelling otherwise well intentioned civil servants to sift through the transmissions of US citizens and allies under the false idol of “national security” represents a sort of cancer of civil society. The future is not for the faint hearted. Unfortunately, the faint hearted are in charge.

The assertion that X number of terrorist attacks were prevented by internal espionage activity is patronizing rhetoric uttered by functionaries who are powerless to actually prove it. Obviously we have enemies. We’ve earned it. The US is not a target simply because “we love freedom”, a slogan so infantile that it is a wonder that Bush II was able to utter it with a straight face. We are a target because of decades of foreign policy overreach.

The US federal government and allied corporations are so brain addled over Middle Eastern politics and security that congress is deadlocked over what amounts to a new form of the guns v. butter problem.  Congressional members, I’ll say Republicans in particular, live in another world distorted by wealthy patrons.  In their view, civilization is something that markets do rather than the other way around. This is a natural viewpoint if you control a lot of wealth- or hope to.

Simplistically, we input defense dollars into the military machine and privately owned petroleum comes out the other side. So, the stockholders of Exxon, Chevron, etc., are protected from risk on foreign territories by the US armed forces. US taxpayers pay for this but petroleum companies seem to carry little of the burden.

What we have gotten in return for our foreign petroleum adventures is pushback in the form of guerrilla warfare, commonly called terrorism. The term “terrorist” has been transmogrified into some form of supernatural evil. Really, a terrorist is a criminal. Killing people and destroying property is a crime and it is immoral. It is not evil incarnate. We are not in a supernatural battle between good and evil or God and Satan.

If Snowdon’s action was to shine a little light on how the government commits espionage on its citizens, then I say good for him. In doing so he broke the law. He violated contractual agreements on disclosure and should pay a price for that. But in regard to accusations of treason based on what facts are available, I cannot agree with that charge.

Is lifting combat restrictions on women the achievement we need?

1 Reply

I am torn on the matter of Defense Secretary Panetta lifting restrictions on combat duties for women. I understand the rationale for greater upward mobility for women in the military. And I grasp that women are already operating in combat areas.

The point I want to offer is this:  rather than broadening the range of the population who may be exposed to combat, perhaps we should put as much energy into demilitarizing just a little bit. If bringing women fully into combat is a solution, then maybe we do not understand the problem.

As an advanced society the USA should be striving to avoid the production of disabled combat veterans. Could it be that we should engage in less combat? Isn’t that the solution we should be seeking?

Right now the USA is so heavily armed with kill-at-a-distance lethality that we have become at ease with radio-controlled diplomacy.  When you have the US arsenal in your pocket, everything looks like a helicopter landing zone.

There is so much money to be made in plundering petroleum resources abroad and in military armaments and materiel that a persistent and refractory global sub-economy of state-protected mineral extraction has frozen in place. With every kilowatt of new load connected to the power grid and with every clever new military toy that is invented we tighten the spiral toward a global energy war.

Where does this new load come from? All of the microprocessed consumer devices certainly contribute. All of the wall-wart chargers for cell phones, iPads, laptops, etc., put stress on the power distribution system and in due course create demand for fossil fuels. This demand is manifested in several ways- 1) electric current to power the devices, and 2) all of the upstream power needed from mine or wellhead to produce ultrapure gallium, arsenic, tellurium, silicon, aluminum, titanium, boron, polyethylene, polypropylene, organic semiconductor materials, etc.

If we take the view that exposing women in our volunteer military to the horrors of combat represents some kind of progress, then I beg to differ. I would like to suggest that the folks in the DoD, the administration, and the congress have salved over a civil service inequity in exchange for equal opportunity for a spectrum of life altering traumas. In regard to military matters, our government and military elites are swept up in a food web of moral corruption so systematically ossified that I do not see how we can steer civilization away from a Malthusian step change.

Fulminating Belief and the Drake Equation

2 Replies

It seems to me that the character(s) who produced the YouTube video that has caused so much religious fulmination in the sandy parts of the world ought to be parachuted into Cairo to answer for their actions. Surely they can give the best explanation of what their movie represents.

Another thing has occured to me. Perhaps we should make a minor adjustment to the Drake Equation which describes the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which communication might be possible. The equation can be found at this link.  The L factor defines the length of time a civilization releases detectable [radio] signals into space. Given the self destructive behaviours of beings capable of generating radio signals on at least one planet, maybe it is time to define L*.

L* = L(1 – P*/P) where P = average number of intelligent inhabitants of a planet and P* = average number of intelligent inhabitants willing to die/kill for their magical or political beliefs.

Perhaps the reader has a better modification.  Here is the Drake equation copied straight from Wikipedia:

N = R^{\ast} \cdot f_p \cdot n_e \cdot f_{\ell} \cdot f_i \cdot f_c \cdot L

where:

N = the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which communication might be possible;

and

R* = the average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy
fp = the fraction of those stars that have planets
ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets
fℓ = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point
fi = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life
fc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
L = the length of time for which such civilizations release detectable signals into space

General remarks

Leave a reply

I wish to make a few remarks on current news items of interest.

Country singer Randy Travis was found in a ditch in north Texas allegedly drunk, naked, and belligerent following an apparent one car accident.  Crimony! It’s that awful Nashville music that he sings. If I sang that twangy, mornful, depressing stuff all the time, I guess I’d be sloppy drunk in a ditch too. He should dry out and switch to show tunes or something a bit more cheerful.

It seems that while the televisions and internets of the world are busily dulling enchanting us into the delusion that our ever accelerating consumption of resources and expansion into wild spaces are having no effect on the “natural world”, the global ecosystems are actually in trouble. I emphasize natural world only because so many of us are preoccupied with the on-line world. In fact, many are worried about a “state change” in the global ecosystems.

In Approaching a state-shift in Earth’s biosphere, a paper just published in Nature, the authors, whose expertise spans a multitude of disciplines, suggest our planet’s ecosystems are careening towards an imminent, irreversible collapse.

Earth’s accelerating loss of biodiversity, its climate’s increasingly extreme fluctuations, its ecosystems’ growing connectedness and its radically changing total energy budget are precursors to reaching a planetary state threshold or tipping point. [ The Automatic Earth, August 6, 2012. ]

I know, I know. Sounds like Chicken Little. But we should pay more attention to our small planet. The atmosphere is thinner than most people think, the fisheries are stressed, desertification is happening in Africa, and human population pressures are mounting in many locations.  We can’t keep the extractive industries going forever. We need to find an economic model or culture that allows us to do with less mass. Reduced consumption per capita. Look, it’ll happen anyway as key resources dwindle.

We should be aggressively recycling lithium, gallium, tellurium, indium, and the rare earth elements in particular.  These are key elements in our much beloved electronic devices. There are other materials to watch, including hydrocarbons in general.  A society with infrastructure causing one to hop in the SUV and drive 5 miles from their isolated subdivision to buy cigarettes and beer is a society that is on a rendezvous with destiny.

Curiosity on Mars

1 Reply

Photo of Curiosity during descent phase, taken from orbit. This shot is amazing all by itself.

Curiosity in descent phase. Photo taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Univ. of Arizona.

Curiosity is powered by a Pu-238 oxide thermoelectric generator. The Multi-Mission Radiosiotope Thermoelectric Generator, MMRTG, has an output of 2000 watts thermal and 100-120 watts electric. The MMRTG unit sits in the aft end of the rover enclosed by a finned heat exchanger.

Aurora Shooting

3 Replies

At some point we Americans are going to have to address the peculiar gun fetish that marks the national character.  Between the NRA and the entertainment industry, we have way too much fascination with firearms and destruction for our own good.  When citizens aren’t being entertained by gunplay on TV and the movies, more than a few citizens are out shooting at other citizens or the police, invading foreign countries with guns, cheering bloodlust at National Rifle Association rallies, giving heartfelt testimonials to our devotion to the 2nd amendment, watching reality television programming about gunsmiths and their frothy zeal for firepower, daring people to wrench our guns from our cold dead hands, equipping our municipal law enforcement with militaristic firepower, selling armaments all over the world, and training our young soldiers to be ever more effective in the killing arts.  Obviously soldiers have to kill effectively, but do we put enough energy into avoiding battle with smarter foreign policy and thus making fewer veterans?

All of the bravado about our national ability to kill with pinpoint accuracy from anywhere a drone can fly has the effect of normalizing or sanitizing the act of killing. Firearms and conflict are big business and presently politicians who stand up to these interests are unelectable.  Is this really a desirable consequence of the market- to allow gun violence to thrive as a side effect of the arms industry and laissez faire legitimized by the 2nd amendment?  Perhaps the US constitution is inadequate to provide for the conduct of civilized society with it’s 18th century publication date.  Why do constitutional guarantees like due process only apply to citizens?  How is it “OK” to have a Gitmo?  Who is this great nation that has extraordinary rendition?

Gun control really comes down to urge control. These pitiful, fearful people who have armed themselves to the teeth in their basements aren’t going to lose their guns anytime soon. Hell no. There isn’t an ounce of political courage in the entire continent to cause that to happen. Instead, we are likely to tighten the civil arms race as the rigor mortis of paranoia stiffens our imaginations against new ways to conduct civilized society.

We need to consider that gun bravado of all sorts is substantially a form of violence bravado and is a disfigurement. Mature peace loving adults should reject gun and other violence as entertainment and as a normal fact of life. More to the point, we should challenge Obama and Romney to identify exactly how they will act to turn gun violence around in this country.  Greater law enforcement is not the answer, nor is the imposition of more severe punishment.  We have to find a way for people to make money waging peace. Right now, there is too much profit in armanment and conflict.

We cannot allow the Aurora shooting to become normalized by a quiet passing into the murky depths of history. We, all of us, should push back against this disfigurement on our civilization. One mass killing is one too many. I’ll be volunteering with campaign work monday to put better elected officials in office. What will you be doing to turn this around?

Corporate person Pratt & Whitney provides attack helicopter technology to China

Leave a reply

Lets give a big Bronx cheer for Pratt & Whitney, a subsidiary of United Technologies (UTC), for illegally providing turbine engine technology to China.  And, while we’re at it, lets give a toot for Hamilton Standard for providing the control software.

According to a recent article in The Atlantic, the Canadian division of Pratt & Whitney provided engines for the production of the Chinese Z10 attack helicopter. It is worth the read.

The Chinese helicopter that benefited from Pratt’s engines and related computer software, now in production, comes outfitted with 30 mm cannons, anti-tank guided missiles, air-to-air missiles and unguided rockets. “This case is a clear example of how the illegal export of sensitive technology reduces the advantages our military currently possesses,” Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director John Morton said in a statement released on June 28.  The Atlantic, July 6, 2012.

According to the Federal Contractor Misconduct Database of the top 100 offending corporations, UTC ranked number seven.

OK. I’ll state the obvious. This is a very eggregious crime.  If an individual did this, the outcome for such a person might be considerably more punitive. But an amoral corporate being like UTS and it’s wayward subsidiary Pratt & Whitney, the consequences are more abstract. A $75 million hit to the bank account for aiding a nation who’s military influence in the eastern Pacific rim is increasingly in conflict with US interests.  Not a trivial consequence, but nonetheless a consequence that does not match the transfer of sensitive technology to a country with values antithetical to US policy.