Toxic Personalities- The Alpha Male

4 Replies

If you were to look at me, Th’ Gaussling, as a chemist, you might suppose that the biggest obstacle I or other industrielle Ubermenschen faced in our exalted careers related to the transmutation of matter.  Easy conclusion.  To civilians who can barely mix Ovaltine in their 2 % milk, making a metric ton of sensitive, high value-added product to specification from dirt and motor oil would seem daunting.  And to be sure, it is.  But it’s all in a days work. (wink wink, nod nod)

However … (dramatic pause) … chemistry is easy when compared to other issues in the fabulous world of work.  The truly challenging part of work is having to deal with difficult people.  Overexposure to toxic personalities can cause chronic chafing, distress, or worse. 

It is amazing how outrageous some people can be.  A while back we interviewed a swaggering gasbag who proved to be 4 or 5 standard deviations from the mean in his cockiness.  The word that comes to mind is sphincter.  I hadn’t seen this chap in nearly 10 years. But in the first 5 sentences of our brief reunion he had already established his career and organizational superiority. It was only partly in jest.  Then to top it off, he declared after 3 minutes of awkward discussion and glances at the watch that he had no more time to talk. No doubt in his absence there would be utter chaos back at work. 

Afterwards I stood there in awe of the natural phenomenon I had just witnessed.  What do you do with such people? We’re not supposed to shoot them.  This fellow is one of those alpha males who consume all of the air when they walk into a room. If he isn’t able to dominate the situation, he just leaves.  When he walks in, the room lights up due to all of the sunlight shining out of his arse.

When asked about the hardest group of people to manage, this chemical engineer said without hesitation “Ph.D. Chemists”.  He said that he greatly preferred to work with hourly plant people and that Ph.D. chemists tend to pose problems that are more intractable than plant operators. Chemists on salary tend to argue and hourly folk just shrug and do what they are told.  Damned right, bucko!!

If you have ever met a company president, you may notice that they are peculiar sorts who seem to be cut from a certain kind of cloth.  Those who aspire to such elevated status have to rework themselves from mere management soldiers into an executive.  Executives are beings who become organic manifestations of the company.  When the CEO of NewCo visits, later you would say that “NewCo was here”.  And you’d be right.   

It is not enough to be merely competent to be a company executive.  Luck, organizational skill, and a bit of ruthlessness are the stars that have to line up to get to the top.  Ruthlessness by itself usually isn’t enough.

>>>End Rant Subroutine<<<

Wohler’s Urea

Leave a reply

Over at A Synthetic Environment you can find an extensive collection of portraits of Friedrich Wohler. It’s pretty cool.  For you historians of chemistry, Wohler was a colleague of Justus von Liebig and a student of great Jons Jakob Berzelius.  After his inadvertant synthesis of urea in 1828 and subsequent realization of its significance, Wohler reportedly told Berzelius

 “I cannot, so to say, hold my chemical water and must tell you that I can make urea without thereby needing to have kidneys, or anyhow, an animal, be it human or dog“.

I do not have a primary reference for this quote, but true or not, it’s a great line.

Iranian Homebrew Fission- Fait Accompli? Rev 1.1

2 Replies

Iranian progress towards nuclear fuel processing seems to have everyone twittered. Recently on NPR a guest raised the question as to whether or not Iran has enough reactor capacity to consume the potential output of their nascent uranium enrichment program.  Good question.

The refinement of fissile materials offers hazards that are poorly understood outside the actinide community.  One of them is the “criticality” hazard.  In the US nuclear program, there have been a few criticality events leading to heavy radiation dosages and even death in a few cases, i.e., Louis Slotin.  Slotin’s case is unusual in that he was manipulating a subcritical bomb assembly rather than a uranium solution. A recent example is the criticality event at Tokai-mura.  According to the literature, numerous elements (in addition to beryllium) absorb alpha’s and then emit neutrons.

One wonders if the Iranians have the infrastructure to safely perform this activity.  A nuclear state needs a health physics community, sensitive and accurate radiation detection systems, and the ability to handle hazardous radioactive materials that are chemical hazards as well. Then there is the matter of what to do with high level rad waste.  The US is still struggling with its rad waste inventory generations after the Manhattan project began.  Who knows, maybe NIMBY isn’t an issue in modern Persia.

Nuclear weapons seem so secular for hyperorthodox nations. But these things do capture the fancy of many people- even followers of the worlds major Iron Age religions. Among scientists, the explosive runaway potential was considered not long after it was discovered that nuclear fission released two neutrons per fission.  The human brain seems constructed to find extrema.

I wonder how the Iranians will validate their weapon’s design? I assume their program is not an ab initio project.  No doubt they have culled design information from somewhere (Pakistan?).  Eventually they have to assemble their weapon and tighten the wingnuts on the casing.  But how will they know if it has enough thump?  Will they be able to resist performing a test shot?  Israel, to its credit, has not performed a test of theirs, though I have no doubt that considerable super computer time has been dedicated to validating their design.

How will these sons of Xerxes construct the chain of command for the release of nuclear weapons?  What kind of fail-safe mechanisms will they put into place to safeguard against inadvertant or unauthorized arming and detonation? Even martyrs have to be careful.

Nuclear weapons have their military uses, but they are primarily a political amplifier used by states to project their voice on the world stage.  But what happens when a religion gets hold of nuclear weapons?  Clearly, the Islamic Republic of Iran is interested in more than mere self defense.  They seem compelled to promulgate standards and doctrines given to them in the form of revealed truth.  A nuclear weapon is as much about prestige and credibility as firepower. 

The Iranians are very pragmatic people.  They know that the US can easily rain nuclear destruction on them and then bounce the rubble a few times for good measure.  They’ll use the bulk of the uranium for electrical power generation.  But they’ll be sure to use a part of it for politcal power generation.

Purchasing Chemicals from China

Leave a reply

I’m having to search far-off China for raw materials much more frequently these days. The availability of many US manufactured chemicals is slowly falling off.  Especially for really basic materials.  I’m not referring to those mundane elements like iron or soda ash or copper. No no. materials from the folds and deep recesses of the periodic table. Elements with relativistic electrons.  There are short term economic pluses and minuses to this migration of manufacturing.

On the plus side, Chinese prices are often, well,  quite low. Even with multimodal freight charges from across the Pacific. When you pay peasants fresh off the farm $40/month (or whatever insane wage it is), you can undercut nearly everyone in pricing. 

But there is a down side to spot buying from China.  This is to be distinguished from contract purchasing.  In contract purchasing, you work out an agreement with a manufacturer and you lock in quality, price, and delivery in exchange for long term business.  Spot buying, however, is much more risky. What do I mean by that?

Spot buying is where you find a merchant supplier who can furnish material without the fuss and obligations of a contract.  Either they have it in inventory, they can source it quickly, or they themselves will make it pronto.  A supply contract has to be managed or enforced.  For raw materials that are less than critical, finding a spot supplier makes sense. 

Locating a spot supplier in China that you can trust is problematic. I’m not suggesting that Chinese suppliers are dishonest.  I am saying, however, that culling out a supplier from a list of unfamiliar names from the other side of the world without the benefit of a site visit or a Dunn and Bradstreet report can be risky. Spot buying anywhere is risky, but when it is complicated by international transactions, the risk multiplies a bit.

It is relatively easy to find contacts on the web that will reply to an RFQ (request for quotation) by email (often “hotmail” accounts) and make an offer.  But what you find is that you may be in contact with an agent of some description in an office suite in Shanghai, far from the factory.  Indeed, it is hard to tell just what the relationship is between the factory and your contact.  To salve over some of the uncertainty westerners may have, it is common now for these web contacts take on western names. 

Brokering goods is common in some parts of the world and scarce in others.  In the USA, brokering chemicals is fairly uncommon.  Most US companies prefer to do bulk business with the manufacturer or a catalog house.   Sigma Aldrich, for instance, is both a catalog company and a manfacturer of bulk and semi-bulk materials.  Purchasing from a broker (as opposed to a distributor) rather than the manufacturer will add costs to the transaction.  A broker is someone who connects the purchaser with the supplier.  Usually they perform drop shipments to the purchaser directly from the manufacturer.  A broker is a sort of “free agent” sales group.

I have found that there is a greater reliance on brokering in Asia and to a lesser extent, the EU.  The internet has made life a bit trickier for brokers in that a search for manufacturers is a lot less painful than it used to be.

A company will work through a broker for several reasons. Brokers are usually specialists, so a company can tap into considerable expertise in supply chain management.  And, the broker only gets paid if they find a qualifying supplier, so a manufacturer could conceivably keep the head count down. Brokers might be better at the intricacies of negotiation as well.  There are a lot of tough guys running companies out there who are actually poor negotiators.

These agents seem to work in organizations that carry on the sales and marketing activity for a factory or a series of factories.  In addition to unfamiliar business practices, there is the matter of payment.  Many Chinese companies want prepayment- they do not automatically offer 30 days net.  This makes company controllers and project managers nervous.  Since this is an international transaction, customary business laws covering remedies are not applicable. In other words, you can get royally screwed. But from their perspective, it is the same issue.  So settling into a supply relationship can take time.

Deutsche Bank’s Sankey: Simple Scarcity Driving up Fuel Prices

5 Replies

As everyone knows, the price of gasoline in the USA has been steadily marching up into the low US$3.00 per gallon range to achieve all-time high pricing.  Reliable sources state that the price run-up is due to simple shortage of supply. According to testimony from energy analyst Paul Sankey of Deutsche Bank, the US refines 17 million barrels of petroleum per day against a demand of 22 million barrels per day.  An interesting analysis can be found at the Oil Drum. 

We are in a very precarious position here. An oil shock caused by a catastrophic loss of refining capacity will result in a wild price spike (some estimate US$100/bbl) while gasoline is in the mid $3.00 range already and a major perturbation to the economy- or worse.  Unfortunately, we are bogged down in the ill-conceived GW-II, the second of the energy wars. 

Farewell, Cutty Sark!

Leave a reply

Th’ Gaussling is still reeling from the news from London that the magnificent tea clipper, the Cutty Sark, has burned.  This great wooden vessel was dry-docked in or in the vicinity of Greenwich, England. 

Officials connected with the ship stated that “This is a significant blow and a major set back for the ship.”  Well, yeah.

Perhaps the ship can be reconstructed and the duplicate put in place.  Who knows? What a bummer.

China to Surpass USA in Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2007

Leave a reply

An article by John Richardson in the May 7-13 issue of ICIS Chemical Business reports that China will surpass the United States as the leading emitter of Greenhouse gases by the end of 2007, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). I wasn’t able to trace the actual IEA report down, but perhaps some sleuth out in the blogosphere can find it.  More details can be found in this article in the Guardian.

I was amused by this quote in the Scotsman–

In a separate briefing yesterday, Jiang Yu, of China’s foreign ministry, said Beijing was willing to play its part in curbing greenhouse gases from industry, agriculture and vehicles. But she said that wealthy countries bore the blame, and the solution lay in their hands.

“It must be pointed out that climate change has been caused by the long-term historic emissions of developed countries and their high per-capita emissions. Developed countries bear an unshirkable responsibility,” Ms Jiang said, adding they should “lead the way in assuming responsibility for emissions cuts”.

I’d like to suggest to Ms Jiang to ask a few of her countrymen who did their graduate work and post-docs in the USA to pitch in on the problem.  China has benefitted in no small way from her citizens taking their education in the USA and helping to generate the very technology that has contributed to our greenhouse gas emissions.  The cause of our prodigous CO2 emission is our great facility with converting combustion gas expansion into torque. This torque drives the wheels and generators of civilization. 

Chinese citizens have benefitted personally through our university/research complex, their graduate stipends often funded by US tax dollars.  The Chinese nation has benefitted collectively with the help of returning students by manufacturing the inventions of the Wright Brothers, Mr Westinghouse, Th. Edison, Philo Farnsworth, Lee De Forest, Edwin Armstrong, Jack Kilby, the Steves Jobs and Wozniak.  These are just a few of the Americans. Then there is a whole crop of Germans, Brits, French, Russians, Japanese, Canadians, Dutch, Scandinavians, Swiss, etc. You get the point. 

The great engine that drives China’s economic boom is in large part leveraged from technologies developed elsewhere- television, radio, computers, cars, chemistry, medicine, etc.  I would say that Chinese society has benefitted significantly from these high consumption, CO2 belching societies that they now point their fingers at. 

I’m glad to see China boosting the standard of living and enjoying the benefits of technological society.  But, Chinese leaders should shut their pie holes and pitch in to solve the problem.  They should remember that the electrical devices and the copper from their smelters afford “high per capita” exports to foreign consumers which helps to sustain our “high per capita emissions”.  There are no clean hands in this matter.

Ullage Motors

Leave a reply

If the reader is interested in the history of aerospace or rocketry, I’d like to recommend the book Saturn, by Alan Lawrie and Robert Godwin, Apogee Books, 2005 (ISBN 1-894959-19-4).  Lawrie is the author and Godwin produced the DVD that is included. The book is a comprehensive history of the Saturn V launch vehicle. 

Flipping through the book I happened to land on page 59 and a section on Ullage Motors.  If you have ever handled bulk liquids in drums or tankers, you know that there must be a certain fraction of the tank capacity left unfilled with liquid.  This gas space, or ullage, prevents rupture of the vessel by expansion of the liquid contents.

Ullage motors were used to get around certain problems associated with using liquid phase propellants in weightless conditions. The contents of a liquid propellant tank always include a volume of ullage.  In free fall it is possible for void spaces to form near the propellant transfer lines. 

Saturn V ullage motors were ammonium perchlorate solid rocket motors externally mounted on the lower part of the second stage.  Immediately after first stage engine cutoff, the first stage would separate and for a short time the upper stages would be in free fall.  To prevent transient fuel starvation problems during engine start it was desirable to force propellant to the bottom of the fuel tank prior to the engine start.  To accomplish this, a group of small solid rockets were fired to provide a bit of acceleration to force the liquid propellant to the bottom part of the tank. The eight ullage motors burned for 4 seconds and each generated a reported 22,500 lbs of thrust. 

Curiously enough, there are a reported 46 intact ullage motors in earth orbit.  The authors conclude that these remnants of the Proton 4 rocket represent explosion hazards. 

To the Moon!

4 Replies

It is hard for most of us to tell but the US is in the early phases of a moon project.  It has adopted the same configuration of command module and lander as the Apollo program.  NASA intends to make a few exploratory missions lasting a week or so and then develop the capability for 180 day missions to the moon. This lunar “base” project is really a local rehearsal for a more ambitious manned Mars landing.  It is called the Constellation Mission. 

NASA has announced the development of two rockets for this mission- the Ares I and the Ares V.  The Ares I uses an in-line single solid rocket booster (SRB) for the first stage and a liquid propellant second stage to boost a 55,000 pound payload into low earth orbit.  Ares I is equipped with a emergency escape rocket in a tractor configuration analogous to Apollo.  As stated in the website, Ares I will be used to put the crew module in orbit for rendezvous with the ISS or cargo modules. 

The Ares V uses two SRB motors strapped to a liquid first stage engine in a fashion similar to the space shuttle. But the crew module will not be on this system.  Ares V is a cargo lifter and will carry 286,000 lbs of mass into low earth orbit.

NASA will be retiring the space shuttle system in a few years. The next man-lifter will be Ares I.  Evidently their faith in the SRB system is high.

That sucking sound heard around NASA these days is the sound of money being pulled from all over the agency and being dumped into this program. We’re going back to the moon, but with no real increase in funding.  Program managers are nervous. 

Wherein Gaussling Laments the Demise of Chemical Photography

4 Replies

A sad day it will be when the last image is captured on a photographic emulsion. The transition from chemical photography to digital photography is well underway.  Indeed, it is clear by a simple visit to a big box store that the amount of shelf space given to film cassettes vs digital cameras & accessories is rapidly tipping in favor of the digital.  Consumer demand is well past the cautious early-adopter stage in its evolution.  Many people are several generations into digital photographic equipment. 

I own a low end Hewlett Packard Model P.O.S.  digital camera with a 4.1 megapixel chip.  I suppose I’d be happier with it if it still worked.  Even when it did work, it was a P.O.S.  As long as nothing moved, the image was sharp and the colors were true.  But given the slow shutter response, the slow shutter speed, and the heavy power demand on the battery, using it was a maddening experience. Evidently a capacitor has failed because the flash fails to fully charge. 

Printing is still a chemical process, one way or other.  Printing consumables like paper and inks/dyes are a major cash cow for all of the manufacturers of printers. 

I do not consider photocopier xerography to be strictly digital imaging.  I consider it to be a form of chemical photography because, despite the use of computer driven laser arrays and electrostatics in image formation, there remains a deep and intricate art in the chemistry of the toner composition.  I have actually done some color toner R&D and can attest to the high art required in that field.

Th’ Gaussling laments the demise of chemical photography, at least on the camera side, because of the highly advanced color chemistry knowledge that will inevitably be lost. Lost because skilled practitioners in the manufacture of color films will retire, labs and plants will be shuttered, and the use of color films will dwindle to low volume.  Soon, say 20 years from now, only eccentric purists and “hobbyists” will capture images on emulsions.  Drug stores will sell off their developing equipment to people who drive VW Beetles in Guatemala and fill the space with racks of diabetic candy, NASA diapers, and $4.99 DVDs. 

Soon, the experience of dodging a poorly exposed image under the projector, swishing print paper in developing solution under red light, and experiencing the magic of seeing an image appear will be lost to future generations.  The smell of acetic acid and the darkroom clutter of wet film hanging from string will be but a distant memory of the “old ones”. 

When I get to the nursing home I’ll regale my fellow geezers and codgers with harrowing tales of nights spent outside at the telescope shooting time exposures with hypersensitized Tri-X.  They’ll nod off in boredom and I’ll switch on a Star Trek rerun and fall into a deep slumber while Kirk and Spock contend with the Tholian Web.  ZZzzzzz.