Clancy’s World of Spooks

It is like a disease. I find myself drawn to Tom Clancy novels.  I picked up Rainbow Six the other day. Other than his Op-Center series, I think I’ve read most of his books.  Clancy is one of the most successful writers in this genre.  Airport bookshops have been good for him.  When I was in the travelling phase of my career, his books were great for passing the time in airports.  Millions of us have read his books.

And millions of us have read Clancy’s idealized interpretation of how the clandestine world operates.  I won’t indulge in a superficial crtitque of the genre or his writing. But I would like to suggest that a population of readers who have followed the characters and themes of his immensely popular books might have developed certain impressions or even, shall we say, expectations, of the those who practice this tradecraft.

After reading his highly detailed and richly woven stories, one might develop the idea- subconsciously, mind you- that the clandestine services were capable of doing anything they set out to do.  Could it be that decades of Clancy’s stories have adjusted the expectations of countless readers in tems of what was possible in the world of the black arts? Could it be that such fiction has inadvertantly prepared our minds in such a way as to accept the assertions of government leaders when they tell us that hostile states have certain threatening capabilities? Surely, with all of the assets and talent at our disposal, when our elected leadership says that a threat exists, can’t we be certain that the conclusion was based on well placed human assets and has been through a series of tests and filters to verify the accuracy and magnitude of the threat? 

For those in power, the notion of “expertise” is not only useful, it may even be critical.  We all want to know that our safety is in the hands of experts. It is a comfort thing. Leaders need to be able to assure the population that experts are on the job and all will be well. 

I would suggest that there is no such thing as “expertise” as an intellectual destination.  There is only a continuum of confusion.  And some of us are more confused than others.

6 thoughts on “Clancy’s World of Spooks

  1. Mark C R (Chemist) UK

    I really like Clancy by the way… but … thinking about it… I would wouldn’t I??

    On the final monologue… I agree – “expertise” is relativistic rather than absolute…

    Like the speed of light…

    I’m rapidly approaching “expertise” but will never actually achieve it….

    I’m happy in knowing what I know and know not to worry about knowing things I don’t know…

    On that final statement I shall bid this post auvoir…

    Reply
  2. John Spevacek

    “24” would be a TV version of this phenomenon: the Counter Terrorism Unit has near instantaneous comupter access to blueprints of all buildings in the LA area, real-time satellite video on call at moments notice (with both visual and IR spectrum so that they can see where people are in the buildings that they have the blueprints for) and a database with everyone employment records for the past 50 years (you don’t ever want to play “6 degrees of Kevin Bacon with those guys!). But hey, I can accept this. Where they really cross over into pure fantasy is with their top agent, Jack Bauer, who never, ever gets stuck in traffic anywhere in LA!

    Reply

Leave a reply to Mark C R (Chemist) UK Cancel reply