I don’t have a clue who is in serious contention for the 2009 Nobel prize in Chemistry. Yeah, there are a bunch of old guys out there who deserve it. But who are the contenders this year? I have all but stopped reading C&EN and JACS, so I am unaware of who this years darlings of chemistry really are.
I’d really like to see Harry Gray share it. I’d like to see Whitesides and Bergman get a trip to Sweden as well. But I’ll admit that I’m well out of the loop. Any thoughts out there? I’m sure that I’ve slept through the discovery, development, and implementation of several new disciplines, each with it’s own journal and series of conferences. It’s inevitable.
10/4/09. OK, I’ll guess Craig Venter for Chemistry and Stephen Hawking for Physics.
10/7/09. Wrong Again!!!! See later post for update.
Lamentations on Chemistry 
Well I loved your reaction to the selection committee. No clues from my end too.
How about Martin Karplus?
Is he still alive?
We hope Prof. C.N.R. Rao gets it this year
Symposium on Poverty and Development
Conference Hall Alankar Bhawan, Boring Road,Patna
National HRD Network,Patna Chapter
Vice President Ratnakar Mishra presiding.
http://www.nationalhrd.org
ratanakar.mishra@gmail.com
Quotation from an introduction and reply by Manu Shanker Mishra.
“In any pedagogy there is suppression.The economics of higher education of a formal system in an overall model of primary,secondary and higher education takes note of both formal and informal education in view of the privileged and under privileged sections of the society.With an intuitive knowledge of the market pulse the analyzer can do regular suppression without ignoring the business cycle caused by zeta function of a double sheeted plane and the first, second or third wave.The shock fronts effect the point of vetification in the social distribution of knowledge.In a system of awarding for a reward in terms of gain of knowledge in the 0 knowledge model there is no future shock or tremor in the present if no institution of higher education is treated as the sole point of reference with high frequency.The informal economy is purposefully ignored and formal education is of a degree even with scholarships,grants and loans.Acceptance is a wish of the priveleged only while for the underprivileged it is what they must accept.Between invention and theory there interval of creative ability and false notions.Comparitive advantages underlying interchange of ideas are repressed as industry and trade insist that there interest must be first attended to.An assymetric technology is not necessarily anti-symmetric but effects priorities.Experiences in Bihar or India do not differ from those of UNESCO and world line has existence only in Editorial Board of New York Times and Discovery Channels.”
Ratnakar Mishra summed up proceedings, thanked the Team which gave the power point presentation and thanked the Lady Social Activist for sharing her experiences with all.
Trish Borgese
October 22, 2009 at 1:56 am
A small telephonic conversation with Manu Shanker Mishra,author on20/10/2009.
What is this the actual import of this comment on Higher Education?
Commercialization of Higher Education increase transactional costs as the state decreases its role and from an arbitrary set of prices we have a concieved and percieved prices in the social choice theory.Knowledge and Understanding treated as seperate, the price actualization is a supply and demand theory only at extremal values.Regional and sectoral balances are evident as those educated under state subsidy as in Indian Institute of Technologies and coming from a poor state like Bihar has Aspirations to work with NASA in USA and not ISRO in India.
The prestigious CERN projects underlying theoretical frame underwent a sea change from creating a sun, to creating super-nova, to creating a Big Bang and discovering the Higgs- Boson to now that a Black Hole would be created.What was in the book Methodological Frame of the Field that shocked Cambridge University, UK to all these eminent and noted scientists?
Methodological Frame showed that a pie subscript 0 particle and the Higgs-Boson as a neutral scalar in a z distribution would create a Black Hole.This pie subscript 0 was something previously unheard of as a fundamental particle in theories of neutrinos only pie superscript 0 was in use.The most important change was trace, retrace and V spin.
Were you considered to young by the Nobel Prize Institute for a prize in 2009 or was it that you are from an underprivileged region?
What The Nobel Prize Committe in Stockholm, Sweden or Oslo, Norway do is their business.Why should you or I bother about their choice,newsonomics and Brand names created by American Newspapers and T.V.However there should be a more equitalble funding for rearch.
This is a later part which I found on the internet.take a look
Oct 23/2009
I checked on neutrino’s and whether they are massless or not.It appears to be a part of the neutral scalar of the Higgs Field which CERN spoke of. Can you give some clues?
Methodological Frame of the Field is specific about lepton pairs and the internal structure of g.On a rotational plane of polarization and its flip, taking the 0’s of Seme II,LL.B what we have is three singularities at x,y,z where the axis show a bend around it. Integerating (***)by connecting (**) through looping and contouring we have a structured 0 polarizing at x as pole of order n.The wave function arises as the integral bloats at the central area and becomes pointed for elliptic functions. The internal structure of g has stable and unstable zones as p is unstable.The circumference at the tip of the structured 0 is an event horizon as a conoid.On x now as the axis of n fold symmetry we see the U and V spin.The higgs boson at an infinite and pie subscript 0 being either of same or different order of infinity must be looked into.
This is how the differential equations and differential topology is solved.?
This a method,a naked singularity gives the viewer a chance to see singularities forming but the c would be a variable.A non rotating singularity colliding with a rotating singularity would give a big bang as seen in southern skies for a gamma explosion of the kind seen in the northern hemisphere.
You mentioned multiple Big Bang Thory of the Univers as seen by long big bang of 2005 and gamma burst of 2006 in the preface of your book.If not some proff. Michael Duff of Cambridge University, UK tried to suggest this in 2005 but was derided by Michael Guunn Of MIT,USA because he could not show any maths.How is that?
Without attributing any motive to anyone Cambridge University jumped the gun.
lance bensch says:
October 19, 2009 at 5:51 am
The helical relativistic invariant collapsing in the changed V of IR and UV regime the entire universe is of shock fronts.The deformations in the model of the Standard model of the Universe needed the restorative force being inside.The standard model had to undergo change and there is a trace and a retrace.prestigious project like CEN shook.Now is the turn of prestigious Human Genome Project of the USA. Methodological Frame of the Field And Seme” of LL.B by Manu (Shanker Mishra) needs a serious look.See what is said about the second chapter of Methodological Frame on the web.
Lance Beensch