Category Archives: Science

MRI MRI on the Wall

What the world needs is a good $1000 MRI scan. Why can’t we talk about how to bring down the cost of MRI scanners so that one can be parked in a non-magnetic quonset at Wal-Mart?  After all, the next wave of clinical business innovation has to crack the problem of how to provide lower octane health care.   To be sustainable, the system requires a selection of non-premium services that are modern and sensitive, but are robust and inexpensive enough to operate at $1000 a pop.

Health care organizations need to stop sending the message to Siemens, Fujitsu, GE or whomever else makes MRI scanners that they need to offer more premium scanners with expensive features because others are paying for it.  This is an amped up case of creeping featurism. What about moderate resolution with a basic package of options?   Perhaps this is already happening?

Someone needs to offer the “Kia” of MRI scanners- a moderately priced system with enough features to be useful to 80 % of patients. If the 1 kilobuck scan turns up nothing, then the Doc ratchets up the horsepower another notch.  This is the kind of thinking that is needed to keep the cost of treatment in line with inflation.

Mantle of Insanity

Recently I went to a local outfitter of camping gear to look for Coleman Lantern Mantles. As I was scanning the shelves a cherubic faced clerk came up to me and asked if I needed help. I said I was looking for lantern mantles.

When we arrived to the endcap where they were hanging, I asked him if they were still making radioactive mantles. He looked at me as though I were a bit of a loon. When I pressed the question, he balked and summoned his manager.

The manager, another youngster who was much more of an alpha male, scoffed at my question and tried to assure me that such a thing was absurd. Why in the world would mantles be radioactive? I tried to assure the youngster that, yes indeed, mantles were radioactive at one time because they contained thorium. At this point the manager was becoming visibly annoyed at his time lost addressing the questions of an obvious crackpot.

I recognized the patronizing tone he took and turned and left the store. As a child of cold war science, I have witnessed mantles sitting in a cloud chamber with ionized cloud streamers zipping every whichway from the innocent looking woven bag. Today, schools are terrified of chemicals and radiation science. Mr Manager missed out on a real experience by being born into the post-cold war world of bland science education.

So, my GM counter sits in my office clicking from the occasional background radiation piercing the GM tube. Eventually I’ll find a source to give it something more interesting to detect.

Gaussling’s 12th Epistle to the Bohemians. Elements Rock.

Some acquaintances have asked about my new interest in geology. What’s the deal with rocks and mining? 

What interests me is not so much the economic value and extravagant production of certain minerals and precious metals. What is of interest is the question of how it came about that there is such a thing as an ore body.  An ore body is a geological formation which is defined by a localized concentration of certain substances. How does it happen that chemical elements can become concentrated from a more distributed condition?

Celebrity astronomers are often seen on cable channels pedantically nattering on about “Star Stuff”.  OK, Dr. Skippy, what is star stuff and what does it do? What are the particulars about the local star stuff, ie., the earth? This is the realm of cosmochemistry and geochemistry- elective classes the TV glamour boys apparently skipped.

The nucleosynthesis of the heavy elements (C to U) and their subsequent ejection from exploding stars is an inherently dispersive process. Eventually, here and there, some heavy matter will aggregate to form a protoplanetary cloud which can then produce planetary bodies. Inevitably, some of the heavy matter is pulled into massive bodies dominated by the presence of thermonuclear fuels- that is, hydrogen and helium. Sufficiently large accumulations of these two highly abundant elements will compress and initiate a self-sustaining fusion reaction of hydrogen to form the (n+1)th generation of stars. All told, some heavy matter accumulates to form of planetary bodies while some of it siphons into the next generation of stars.

It is within the ability of gravity to concentrate matter into smaller volumes of space as a dense, bulk phase. The geometric shape that allows all of the mass to be as near the center of mass as possible is the sphere.  This is why we don’t see planets shaped like cubes, pyramids, or ponies. 

Once cooled well below incandescence, the matter in a sufficiently constituted and situated planet may begin to self-organize into chemical phases. Along the lines of the Three Bears allegory, Earth is parked in an orbit that is just right for the presence of liquid water. Irrespective of the needs of life, liquid water is critical for the eventual concentration of some elements into ore bodies.

Earth has a gas phase blanketing a liquid phase which wets much of the bulk rocky phase of the planet. A generous portion of water circulates in the maze of fractured recesses of the planetary crust. In the case of Earth, we know that our planet has a fluid core within a solid shell. This molten phase in the core energizes a kind of convective heat engine that will drive the shuffling motion of tectonic plates and episodic volcanic mass transfer on the surface. 

Matter has gravitationally self-organized at the planetary scale on the basis of density. But what is perhaps most interesting to a chemist is the phase composition of the planetary solid matter. On cooling, a body of magma will sequentially produce precipitates representing different chemical substances. Over geological time this igneous rock may experience modification by the hydrothermal action of hot water under high pressure. Depending on its circumstances, parts of the formation may be depleted of soluble constituents or it may receive a deposit of new mineral species.

On the scale of planets, the earth has self-organized into bulk phases of matter- Solid, liquid, and gas. But at a much smaller scale, the earth self-organizes into domains of chemical substances. This is evident by simple inspection of a piece of granite. A piece of pink granite shows macroscopic chemical domains of potassium feldspar, quartz, and mica. While these three mineral components of granite are compounds and not pure elements, they nonetheless represent self-organization of species based on chemical properties.

The forces that drive chemical differentiation in mineral formation are ultimately thermochemical in nature. Large differences in Ksp lead to partitioning and phase separation of distinct substances. Subsurface formations may be approximately adiabatic on a short time scale, but over deep time they can slowly cool and equilibrate to yield a sequence of fractional crystallizations of metal carbonates, oxides, silicates, and aluminates giving rise to a complex bulk composition.

Speaking only for myself, coming to an understanding of how mineral deposits form is a kind of hobby.  If I wanted immediate answers to specific questions, I suppose the most expedient thing would be to consult a geochemist. But where is the adventure in that? The answers are not the fun part. The real adventure is in the struggle to find the best questions. As it often happens, once you can frame the problem sufficiently, the answer falls out in front of you. Whoever dies with the greatest insight wins.

Is Private Sector Buggery Better than Gov’t Incompetence?

Healthcare in the USA is wildly expensive and is growing more so at a rate that exceeds inflation. This is well known. The battle for healthcare reform in DC is bogging down under the weight of private interests and infighting.  Soaring rhetoric from both left and right is mistaken for intellection and reason. It is evident that the fix to the problem was started before there was a clear understanding of the variables.

If you look at healthcare as a manufacturing activity with labor, capital equipment, and materials as input and some sort of health benefit as the output, you can start to see what cost inputs may begin to dominate. Of course this is very simplistic, but hang with me.

A round of health care involves attention by highly trained and expensive labor. A health care worker can only attend to one person at a time, though that worker may have many patients under his/her supervision. If a patient is stabilized, the care worker can also attend to other patients and achieve some sort of parallel production for better cost containment. In the heirarchy of medicine, the docs are managers who provide oversight to nurses who manage the patients. Docs also do consultations, examinations, and perform surgery, so they are not pure people managers- they get their hands dirty. Docs are a unique class of management all by themselves.

To exaggerate the effects of labor costs, imagine if you had a doc or a nurse picking strawberries, how expensive would the strawberries be? Even if Dr. Picker was very fast, the berries would be expensive. To have reasonably priced berries you have to find workers who will do the work at a lower wage. Lower wages derive from an abundance of willing labor.

In the end, medical schools control the scarcity of physicians by controlling enrollment. And the enrollment is defined by the curriculum, faculty size, and the particulars of the coursework- availability of clinical experiences, lab space, equipment, etc. But, you have to wonder what would happen to medical costs if there was less labor scarcity.

The most important resource a medical school has, other than faculty, might be the university hospital. What if more hospitals had medical schools rather than the other way around? I don’t think that the existing medical schools have absorbed all of the bright candidates out there.

Health care is a kind of economic chimera. The recipient of medical treatment is not the person in control of the costs. Physicians prescribe the type and extent of resources and the insurance companies release the funds. The medical establishment receives payment for services irrespective of outcome. Insurance companies profit by denial of services. The patient is left to sort out how to get the best value from available treatment.

American medicine is very much influenced by technological triumphalism.  New and expensive materials and devices hit the market all of the time. The question every potential marketer of medically related items must ask is- will the docs use or prescribe it? The most powerful instrument in medicine is the physician’s pen. The question for drug and equipment makers is, how do you get the docs to use their pens to your advantage?

The view that a disease or an injury is a sales opportunity is what drives for-profit clinics and hospitals. Without chronic disease, accidents, and sporadic outbreaks of mayhem, growth and profit in the healthcare industry might be more static.

So in the end, who do you trust? Do you put your faith in the private sector whose avowed goal is to profit on your illness? Or do you trust the government which, though accountable to its citizens, is prone to profound organizational inertia and a lackluster draw to talented staff?  This is the balance of opposing forces the fools in Washington are trying to sort out. Howard help us all.

Bruker’s New 1 Gigahertz NMR Spectrometer

June 1, 2009, Bruker announced the release of the AVANCE 1000 NMR Spectrometer. This 1000 MHz (1 GHz) instrument features a standard 54 mm bore within a 23.5 Tesla superconducting magnet. The magnet technology offers subcooling (below the bp of He) in the magnet, which Bruker claims to be necessary for the stability of the magnetic field. Bruker also offers nitrogen-free magnets that are able to keep the helium boil-off rates to a minimum. While it would be nice to avoid having to manage two cryogenic liquids, I wonder what the pay-back time is for the chiller equipment?

Imagine the hassles, begging, and incredulous stares that the users will have to contend with to to get some 1 GHz NMR time? I wonder if anyone will do 1-D experiments with it?

The AVANCE  1 GHz instrument is priced at a cryogenic ~$16,000,000 per copy with an 18-24 month lead time. I’ll have to stick with Anasazi Instruments for a while at least.

Separately, a link at the Bruker website will take you to the University of York where a site dedicated to one groups NMR work with parahydrogen is detailed. A technique called SABRE, Signal Amplification by Reversable Exchange, is described. The exposure of an NMR sample to parahydrogen (singlet H2) results in the transfer of polarization to the sample and subsequent increase in sensitivity.

The workers describe the operation of a device used for the conversion of triplet orthohydrogen to singlet parahydrogen as a ready source of this peculiar “isomer” of dihydrogen. Parahydrogen is the dominant form at 20 K, but drops to 25 % abundance at room temperature. Exposure of a mixture of ortho and parahydrogen to a paramagnetic catalyst does the conversion to achieve enriched singlet H2.

According to one on-line source, the conversion of ortho- to parahydrogen evolves 527 kJ/kg. I’d watch out.

July Lenticular Clouds

Warmer weather in Colorado brings cloud formations that are characteristic to the summer season. Summer in the Colorado front range typically brings convective activity that boils up cumuloform clouds, some of which accelerate into anvil shaped storm cells that bring rain and hail.

What are not often seen in the summer, at least for a hack weather observer like Th’ Gaussling, are lenticular clouds. These are characteristic of the cooler seasons. Indeed, since I have been following weather here (late 1970’s), I have never witnessed lenticular clouds in July, at least until yesterday. Very curious.

Proterozoic Contact

My search continued today for an exposed contact between the upthrusted proterozoic igneous rock of the Rock Mountains and the Fountain sandstone formation. I returned to an obscure roadcut site I had examined a few months ago. Three (male) cyclists outfitted in expensive cycling couture (Spandex) were standing there nibbling on dainty little energy snacks next to the spot I needed to be as I pulled up and exited my vehicle with a rock hammer in hand. One seemed taken aback momentarily as I walked towards them with the chisled masonry hammer. It didn’t dawn on me until after they left why they were acting strangely- I startled them. Sorry fellas!  \;-)

With rock hammer in hand I scrambled up a steep and unstable scree slope adjacent to what appeared to be disturbed layer next to a gneiss formation. Down below, along the roadcut, a contact was visible between the gneiss and what appeared to be schist.  This dark material has a preponderance of mica with little gross evidence of stratification. I wrongly concluded that I was not near the proterozoic contact.

But as I followed this discontinuity further up the mountain I found clear evidence of a stratified sedimentary formation adjacent to the igneous rock. On a ledge high above the road I found an actual contact between what appears to be modified sandstone and gneiss. I found a sample that has the gneiss fused onto the layered rock that fractures into thin sheets much like sandstone or shale. Regrettably, I left the camera in the Jeep.

What appears to have happened is that the sandstone layer has been thermally modified along the interface due to the intimate contact with the upthrusted igneous rock. I had half-expected to see a simple interface between sandstone and an igneous rock. Instead, what I seem to be seeing at this site is a modified sedimentary layer that shows evidence of some localized metamorphic modification.

A nearby thin layer of rock in the interface zone appears to be glassy or vitrified, as though it has been partially melted. I do not interpret this to be a result of weathering. A rapidly approaching lightning storm forced me to cut my exploration short and run for cover.

So, I have some hypotheses beginning to take shape. Now the question is, how do I falsify my interpretations? I certainly have much to learn about petrology.

National Organic Symposium. Wender Wednesday.

My final attendance at the National Organic Symposium was Wednesday evening. An award was presented to editor-in-chief, Scott Denmark, on behalf of the monograph series Organic Reactions. The original editor was none other than Roger Adams. Denmark presented a retrospective slide show on the history of Organic Reations.

The speaker for the evening was Prof. Paul Wender from Stanford.  Wender presented a long but fascinating talk on his work with several complex molecules including bryostatin. I have to say that I was rather blown away by this work. I guess I’ve been living on a desert island.

Wender has the great fortune of having access to facilities and people who can do complex chemical synthesis and biological assays and all of the other wondrous things that are necessary to rapidly expose a valuable biopharmaceuticals. The payoff is that questions relating to the biological activity of particular derivatives can be answered rapidly and productive leads can be isolated and further cultivated.

This confederation of resources is perhaps as important to Wender’s productivity as anything. My point is that to be a Wender, you need more than just smarts and money. You need a network of like-minded coworkers whose particular strengths can mesh with yours to produce these kinds of results.  I think that his ability to pull together these kinds of resources is just as impressive as his native ability with chemistry.

National Organic Symposium. Tuesday Morning.

Bad day for Th’ Gaussling to be away. The hounds are snapping at my heels at work.

I managed only to see Eric Jacobsen‘s talk on catalytic urea chemistry. Jacobsen’s system is pretty much a chiral proton ligand that can carry along a nucleophilic counter anion. Configured differently, urea’s and thiourea’s with BARF groups on the nitrogen can coordinate with chloride. This can lead to the abstraction of chloride to give a carbenium ion that can then participate in a enantioselective Pictet-Spengler type reaction. 

Jacobsen’s system resembles a radically stripped down enzyme in terms of 3-point binding interactions by hydrogen bonding.  Where Jacobsen went askew is the use of calculations to justify his mechanistic model. The models did not include solvent interactions when affording only 0-2 kcal/mol (!!) differences in energy. Naturally this did not set well with certain distinguished members of the Audience.  The ΔΔG’s did not correlate with the ee’s at all either.

A certain J.D. Roberts took great exception to Jacobsen’s molecular modeling results, resulting in the spectacle of a Harvard Professor frantically qualifying his slides and words as he back pedalled for all he was worth. There was some actual contrition there on the stage. It was quite a thing to see. There but for the grace of God go I.

Organic Symposium

Despite my previous gritching about it and despite trying to stay below the radar at work, the boss has requested and required that I attend the Organic Symposium at CU Boulder. I’ll bop over there later today to register and walk the poster session. Maybe there will be some useful grist for the blogmill.

No better reminder of the scientific pecking order than to skuttle around in the shadows of the great grant writers of our time. A certain speaker with a Nobel Prize casts a shadow so large that it is reported to weigh nearly 5 kilograms. Fancy that!