Rocket Racing League

2 Replies

It has finally happened. The Aerospace crowd has formed a NASCAR-like racing league to promote an amped-up form of air racing. It is called the Rocket Racing League.  Velocity Aircraft, now a subsidiary of Rocket Racing Composites Corporation, will supply the airframes. The rocket motors are simple, one piece, throttled, stainless steel motors down-rated from 5000 lbs to 1500-2000 lbs of thrust. The motors will burn LOX and ethanol.

The first exhibition race will occur at the upcoming EAA Oshkosh AirVenture show in Wisconsin this summer.

One important result of this is that, if it is successful, it will demonstrate that entities smaller than governments can safely and profitably do rocketry.  If this field is to go anywhere, it must show that rocket propulsion can be conducted with less-than-NASA resources. 

 

Thoughts On Secrecy in Business

2 Replies

It is unusual to join any company engaged in technology or finance and not have to sign a secrecy agreement. The competitive nature of business is such that information relating to business activity needs to be kept from the prying eyes of the competition. That’s easy to understand. If you refrain from blabbing your activities to the competition, you may have an advantage in the market. It’s a zero sum game- their ignorance is your gain.

But it is possible to stumble across the line from prudent practice to paranoia.  Often is the case that the first draft of a contract or a secrecy agreement is full of grabby, over-reaching terms and conditions that represent a minefield for the inattentive. Negotiation is the act of shaving down unreasonable requirements to an agreeable topography of ups and downs that you can live with.

I have learned that it is best to decline to agree to broad, ill-defined terms, in favor of short, highly focused terms regarding specific actions, information, or outcomes. For instance, agreeing to “hold in confidence all information to relating to the business activity” of a company is a recipe for potential trouble.

It is better to set the expectation that the agreement is for a tightly defined purpose and only a narrowly defined range of information will be disclosed in the first place.  It is important to require that whatever is disclosed is reduced to print, or if disclosed verbally is reduced to a tangible form within a short time period.

If you are going to be subject to a lawsuit due to an alleged breach of secrecy, then it is important to have discoverable evidence that a limited range of information was disclosed. It is also important to set the expectation that Confidential Information is properly marked as such so that the recipient can reasonably prepare to contain it.  You do not want to have hand waving arguments by the other side claiming that “we said (this or that) in a meeting and then the defendant willfully disclosed the information without permission”.  Verbal disclosures are nothing but potential trouble.

Being in possession of another companies secrets is a genuine burden and a risk. You want to minimize it to the greatest extent possible and impose disciplines on the part of both parties to keep the disclosures lean and tight.

Proof

2 Replies

This week a local community theater group is putting on a production of Proof, by David Auburn. It is a drama about an insane mathematician and his daughter.  Since casting didn’t require an oafish, middle-aged cornfed, my role is strictly behind the scenes. My job will be to supply darkness by turning down the lights on cue.

Spent the weekend putting in a new lighting system based on what is available at Home Depot. Actually, the lighting works pretty well.

Reality Check. Always Certain But Frequently Wrong.

2 Replies

One of the benefits of being a student is that there is always someone standing over your shoulder, watching the choices you make. In school you choices result in a score of some sort. Out in the world, your choices have bigger consequences than letter grades.

As in school, the Big Big World is always under time pressure. Better, Faster, Cheaper. There isn’t always time to deliberate on the global optimum solution. In industry, sometimes the choice you make is the first one that shows any promise. Experienced business people know that everything takes longer and costs more than you first realize. There is no substitute for an early start.

What results from this need to jumpstart a project is the failure to question your basic assumptions.  In chemistry, a person may slide into the seductive notion that you are an expert in a process and, of course, you know that your process will work on a particular analog. But, do you really?

Non-linear phenomena are particularly troublesome.  Or phenomena that are polynomial in description.  It is hard to intuit outcomes when terms that were previously small become dominant in the equation. There is no substitute for measurement. If you want to truly understand a thing, eventually you are going to have to make measurements and plot a curve.

Like a lot of people fresh from Grad School, I was sometimes an arrogant turd. Just ask around. Today I am much more cautious about my abilities and knowledge. Periodically I am reminded that intuition can fail. Like a 2×4 between the eyes.

While I can’t give details, I have had to drastically recalibrate my intuition about some things that I believed I had a handle on. It involved mass transport concepts. The separation of substances can be subject to constraints that aren’t so obvious to someone who has only been through the ACS-approved chemistry curriculum. An engineer might have looked at my circumstance and solved the problem in a New York minute.

But Th’ Gaussling had to learn the hard way. What else is new?

Panem et circenses

Leave a reply

Why did the Democratic Party stretch the primary season over such a long period? What is the strategic value in this? Why does election season have to last so long? Don’t people ever tire of the relentless microanalysis? What will anyone really learn from the n+1th debate between Clinton and Obama?

The Romans had this figured out centuries ago- Panem et circenses (bread and circuses).  

In Police Custody- 416 CHildren.

2 Replies

I find myself conflicted about certain aspects of the recent raid on the Fundamentalist Mormon  compound in Texas.  The news reports say that 416 children have been taken into police custody.  Parents and lawyers have been matched up to deal with the gigantic mess that this has caused.

I am not an advocate of polygamy and I am certainly no supporter of Mormonism.  It seems to me that in all of the bizarre theology of Mormonism, the idea of Mormon polygamy isn’t a very large leap of strangeness from its core concepts.  But I digress.

What is outrageous about this event is that 416 children were taken from their home and parents and are being kept by the state of Texas, all on an anonymous phone call.  The accuracy and veracity of the caller may be spot on. But there is such a thing as due process.  The spectacle of a massive police raid resulting in the detention of children, even on clannish wingnuts like this group, should give a chill to all citizens.  The state is exceeding its bounds unreasonably. Strike that. I think that the State officials just do not know what they are doing.

Never attribute to malice what you can first explain by incompetence.

There may very well be a complete absence of resources or protocol for this circumstance. So, the Texas state legislature needs to meet to contrive some sort of consensus and policy in regard to response to the welfare of children in communal living. Some advanced thinking is needed here.  Remember Waco? 

The state turns its head the other way in regard to the plural marriage of old men to minor girls. It needs to look straight at this circumstance and deal with it. This is a conflict between the two magisteria that oversee marriage- religion and the state.  The Texas legislature needs to set clear policy that relieves law inforcement from having to interpret how existing law is to be enforced.

 

On Chemical Negotiation

1 Reply

I always amazes me how little negotiation goes on in chemical B2B transactions. Buyers ask for the price of an obscure chemical and that may be the last you hear from them. Only rarely do I see pushback. Either a purchase order arrives or it doesn’t.  I’m not referring to trainloads of soda ash or other mass quantities of commodity chemicals. I’m talking in the one to 100 of kg range. People naturally take prices as fixed in concrete.

This is especially unfortunate or even tragic for materials that are very unusual. Items that have a low volume or minimal competition are products whose price has not been made rational through the forces of the market place. Competition has not forced the price to an optimum level.

Price is determined by what the market will bear. If there is limited exposure of a product to the market, then a rational price probably has not been reached and someone is leaving money on the table. Prices are initially based on some reasonable multiple of costs. The demand picture and the sellers anxiety to move product determine the real price point.

Much has been written about negotiation. I have no new concepts to add except a reminder that the best deals can come from multiple iterations of offer/counter-offer. Only by going into cycles of offer/counter-offer can you find out exactly what is possible to get from the bargaining.

Some companies, like SAF for example, are notoriously rigid in their approach to sales. I have found that they do fix their prices in blast resistant concrete. SAF is uber-aggressive in the marketplace because they are after total global domination. But not all companies are like this. Many are pleased to make a deal to get some material out of inventory.

What is troublesome for manufacturers of new or obscure products is that the initial price may frighten off a buyer. If the buyer recoils in horror from a price without any attempt to negotiate, then they lose the benefit of that product and the seller loses the sale and perhaps the entire market future of the material. I have seen this happen many times.

What makes this a difficult issue for the seller is that you don’t want to seem too anxious to drop your price. That just telegraphs to the buyer that they should expect a better price. The seller should have a front price that they want and a fallback price that they can live with. It is better to have the fallback price than nothing.  The skill comes in the smooth application of salesmanship.

A good sales person watches the prospective buyer carefully for flight impulse and silently swoops in like a vampire for the seduction and the lusty bite. 

Hip-motized by Doctrine

1 Reply

It is interesting how people can adhere to abstract doctrines while reality rages all around them.  In particular, I am thinking of a recent “conversation” with an economist friend. A fundamentalist libertarian, he steadfastly refuses any hint of pragmatism in favor of his utopian idealology promoted by certain Austrian economists.

To the economist, anthing that smells like collectivism of any sort is deemed an automatic throwback to the failed ideals of Marx. It’s all about the individual and his property. Nevermind that any anthropologist will observe that people spontaneously form groups and associations to lessen risks and burdens associated with survival. 

Harm comes to people and society when those with a power position advocate for abstract doctrines over the welfare of citizens.  Notions of political structure, reproductive issues, qualification for acceptance into an after-life, or slavery are all sacred abstractions on which people have taken stands and many have killed or been killed for.

How many people have needlessly died because of the squeemishness of celebate men with the idea of condoms? How much destruction was released in Southeast Asia due to the opposed idealogies of Marxism and Capitalism?

Today, Americans face continued endurance of a broken health care system because certain vocal idealogues profess doubts over “Socialized Medicine”? American health care is already socialized to some extent. But in a way that favors the flow of cash to the coffers of corporate medical providers and insurers. Why do you think Warren Buffett is so enthusiastic about owning insurance companies?  You get paid up front. Surely there are other health care models out there that we can emulate.

Sustainable Chemistry and YOU

2 Replies

A new chemical journal was distributed at the recent ACS meeting. It is called ChemSusChem and is a European effort published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. The theme is chemistry and sustainability. Librarians and Deans will surely groan when they hear a new chemical journal is available. I don’t know what an institutional subscription costs, but they all seem to be very expensive.

More than a few of us are convinced that we are presently watching a slow motion movie of the de-industrialization of the European Union. Many will scoff at the appearance of another greenish journal, especially from the EU. Indeed, the EU does seem hell-bent on outsourcing its basic industry to other parts of the planet with lower overhead costs. But cost doesn’t seem to be the only driver.

The EU has become a confederation of nanny states, all seemingly pre-occupied with the extermination of risk (and the US is on the way as well).  Some of it is legitimate, I believe, but to a significant extent some of the EU fussing with environmental issues is due to an inability to come to terms with ppm-level risk. Thus REACH.

The effect of REACH may be that this de-industrialization is accelerated. I am now involved in trying to understand REACH and how it affects exports to the EU.  For smaller companies who do not have the administrative structure to accomodate a new shelf of complex regulations, this is a genuine burden. Not just in terms of direct labor to manage it, but also the associated liability of non-compliance.

So, back to sustainable chemistry. The basic idea of sustainability provides for minimizing ecological insult and maximizing the long term availability of natural resources. It is hard to argue with the merits of this. But I would take it a step further.  Sustainable chemistry can easily accomodate advantageous economics if it is executed right.

Advantageous how?

Turns out that the principles of sustainability run in parallel with many good operating practices in process development.  High space yields, good atom efficiency, minimum energy inputs, solvent recycling, hazard abatement, etc. All of these ideals add up to maximum economic benefit.  It is just a form of frugality.

The people who can implement sustainable chemical processing are R&D and process chemists and engineers.  By adding more frugal methodologies to our toolkits, we can put sustainability into practice. The direct benefit would be better process economics. The larger benefit is a better competitive posture for industry that has chosen to remain in the EU or North America.

Sustainable principles applied to process chemistry can be a “next wave” of innovation that can lead to a re-think by business leaders in the eternal chess game of industry.  A tidy bit of “sustainable chemistry” has already been published. We chemists should filter through this to see what may be applicable.

Of course, if our academic friends have been busy beavering away writing patents on it, then it will be a much harder sell to management.  But that is another post.