Another far right-wing character bites the dust.  Seems that Colorado Springs preacher-man Ted Haggard, mullah of the New Life Church, commander of the “Spiritual NORAD”, weekly advisor to George Bush II, and PT Barnum of the New Testament, has been leading a double life.  Seems he has a private taste for what he publically condemns.  Holy revelations, Batman. 

This is a tragic comedy.  There is some smug satisfaction in seeing a prominent theocrat get tangled in a web of his own construction. A most humiliating experience it must be, to be caught indulging in the most forbidden pleasures of the flesh.  But the fall of Ted Haggard is only the tragic part. 

The comedy part relates to the mechanics of operating theocracy.  Theocracy is governance by revelation.  Self-appointed persons claiming to have received special instructions by, or have special sensitivity to, a supernatural being are the governors of a theocracy.  There are no checks and balances. There can be only unblinking obedience.  This event forces us to pause and think about the pragmatics of operating a theocratic state. How divine is the leaders inspiration? How can you discern the direction from God vs the directions from people? This mode of governance is fundamentally flawed because people are forced to interpret nuance and testamonials as opposed to objective, measurable, reality.

Ted Haggard is (was) a prominent leader of a nascent conservative theocratic movement in America.  See for yourself. Look it up.

Soon we’ll see the obligatory sobbing plea for forgiveness and the posturing.  In 5 years he’ll be back preaching from Arkansas or Indiana on the DayStar network. His fall from grace will be the basis of a book and a CD set.  Maybe this is part of the cycle that the Hindu’s talk about.

There is a web site that has been keeping track of a movement in America. It is a quiet movement. It’s purpose is to implement a reconstruction of American values to suit their world view.  The website is the Yurica Report.  It is a movement that seeks nothing less than the establishment of a theocratic form of government in America.  It is also called Theocratic Dominionism or Christian Reconstructionism.  But see for yourself.  Google these terms and browse the websites.

For myself, I have been watching Christian fundamentalism since the early 1970’s.  I recall stopping at a booth at the county fair as a high school student and listening to members of the John Birch Society. I thought at the time that they were Looney Toons, or just a Christian libertarian group.  I guessed that they were mostly harmless.   Well, I was wrong.

Frederick Clarkson at PublicEye.org writes-

“Reconstructionist leaders seem to have two consistent characteristics: a background in conservative Presbyterianism, and connections to the John Birch Society (JBS).”

He goes on to say-

“In 1973, R. J. Rushdoony compared the structure of the JBS to the “early church.” He wrote in Institutes: “The key to the John Birch Society’s effectiveness has been a plan of operation which has a strong resemblance to the early church; have meetings, local `lay’ leaders, area supervisors or `bishops.'”

The JBS connection does not stop there. Most leading Reconstructionists have either been JBS members or have close ties to the organization. Reconstructionist literature can be found in JBS-affiliated American Opinion bookstores. “

But what is reconstructionism about? Again, Clarkson puts it succinctly-

“Reconstructionism is a theology that arose out of conservative Presbyterianism (Reformed and Orthodox), which proposes that contemporary application of the laws of Old Testament Israel, or “Biblical Law,” is the basis for reconstructing society toward the Kingdom of God on earth. “

“Reconstructionism argues that the Bible is to be the governing text for all areas of life–such as government, education, law, and the arts, not merely “social” or “moral” issues like pornography, homosexuality, and abortion. Reconstructionists have formulated a “Biblical world view” and “Biblical principles” by which to examine contemporary matters. Reconstructionist theologian David Chilton succinctly describes this view: “The Christian goal for the world is the universal development of Biblical theocratic republics, in which every area of life is redeemed and placed under the Lordship of Jesus Christ and the rule of God’s law.”

I agree. It is easy to dismiss this as a bunch of paranoid ranting. But if you’re paying attention to things, you might also conclude that we have been in the midst of this movement for some time.  How do you think GW Bush got elected in Tejas? His boyish charm or war record?

I don’t want to give it all away. The reader should see for her/himself.  Let my friend, Mr. Google be your guide on this disturbing journey.

(*fade to black*)

To say that there is a lot of antipathy for the Bush regime would be an understatement. I was vaguely aware of similar dissent during the 1960’s, but I was too young to understand it then.  I do recall family elders dismissing Viet Nam war protesters and “hippies” as communists.  In those days, the word “communist” was an epithet that was used with genuine scorn and derision.  Like the pixelated photo of Lincoln, with distance the image begins to form.  Vague similarities between the times are gradually being recognized. Today you hear Bush conservatives spitting the word “liberal”, often with the phrase “cut and run”.  The allusion, of course, is that liberals will spontaneously take “French Leave” when in power, abandoning the Iraqi people and thereby soiling the memories of soldiers who have fallen in Iraq.  So the theory goes.

There is some interesting content at VDARE.com concerning Gulf War II (GWII).  The author is Paul Craig Roberts.  He was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration.  Mr. Roberts apparently had some sort of epiphany as a political insider and has come out against how the Bush cabal has prosecuted GWII.  Anyway, he makes some interesting points-

“To date more than 100,000 US troops who are veterans of these wars have been granted disability compensation. Although the US cannot put on the ground in Iraq more than 150,000 troops at one time, 1.5 million troops have served so far and 567,000 have been discharged of which 100,000 are receiving disability payments.

Paul Sullivan, director of programs for Veterans for America, says that the current rate of injuries will produce 400,000 American veterans suffering 30% to 100% disability. Apparently, one of the severe forms of disability is post-traumatic stress, which does not count as a physical wound.”

As a news junkie, I’m at least average in attentiveness to such things and I’ve heard precious little about US casualties. If the above is true, then it needs to be announced morfrom every hill top.

Or, consider this unsavory comparison-

Americans are too inattentive and distracted to be aware of the grave danger that the neoconservative Bush regime presents to American liberty and to world stability. The neoconservative drive to achieve hegemony over the American people and the entire world is similar to Hitler’s drive for hegemony. Hitler used racial superiority to justify Germany’s right to ride roughshod over other peoples and the right of the Nazi elite to rule over the German people. Neoconservatives use “American exceptionalism” and “the war on terror.” There is no practical difference. Hitler cared no more about the peoples he mowed down in his drive for supremacy than the neoconservatives care about 655,000 dead Iraqis, 100,000 disabled American soldiers and 2,747 dead ones.

When Bush, the Decider, claims unconstitutional powers and uses “signing statements” to negate US law whenever he feels the rule of law is in the way of his leadership, he is remarkably similar to Hitler, the Fuhrer, who told the Reichstag on February 20, 1938: “A man who feels it his duty at such an hour to assume the leadership of his people is not responsible to the laws of parliamentary usage or to a particular democratic conception, but solely to the mission placed upon him. And anyone who interferes with this mission is an enemy of the people.”

“You are with us or against us.”

Here, Roberts may be going a bit non-linear on us.  Read “Rise and Fall of the Third Reich” by William Shirer.  While Bush II is clearly not on the same philosophical or moral plane as Adolph Hitler, nor as cunning for that matter, the fact is that his handlers are using rhetorical tools from an age-old playbook.  That is, whipping up public fear as a means to concentrate power.  Really, the Bush cabal is mythologizing a foe to achieve an unprecedented concentration of power for the executive branch.  The point of the Hitler comparison is that this kind of consolidation of power has precedent. 

Finally, I’ll agree with those who say that Bush II isn’t smart enough to do this on his own. I’ve seen nothing to indicate that this fellow is much more than a frat boy with a golden name.  Bush and his merry men have managed to make a mess of things and it will take generations of other people to smooth it out.  Recall that we still have troops in Japan and Korea and the veterans of those wars are now passing of old age.